reports from corporate governance land

This proposal marks a new low for the NLPC and the anti-ESG movement. It is deplorable in every sense of the word.

Determining what is a "significant social policy issue" under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) desperately needs a multi-pronged test.

Shouldn’t there be a nexus between a shareholder proposal and the company at which it is filed? The answer to this question seems obvious.

The term “significant policy issue” doesn’t appear anywhere in Rule 14a-8. So, where does this exception come from?

The SEC staff has posted the letter it sent to Brinker International regarding The Humane Society's VSM shareholder proposal.

The SEC staff appears to have flipped the script on shareholder proposals about virtual shareholder meetings.